
Title-page for ‘The Baronet and the Butterfly’ dates from 1898/1899, and is the proposed title page for Whistler 1899 (F)[more].

Title-page for ‘The Baronet and the Butterfly’, Harry Ransom Center, University of Texas, Austin, TX
It is catalogued in MacDonald 1995 (cat. rais.) [more] (cat. no. 1547).

Title-page for ‘The Baronet and the Butterfly’, Harry Ransom Center, University of Texas, Austin, TX

Title-page for ‘Eden versus Whistler: The Baronet and the Butterfly’, Glasgow University Library

Title-page for ‘The Baronet and the Butterfly’, Harry Ransom Center, University of Texas, Austin, TX
A manuscript draft of a title page inscribed 'Eden versus Whistler / The Baronet / & / The Butterfly / A Valentine with / a Verdict // Paris. Dec. 1897.' and signed with a butterfly.
In 1894 William Eden (1849-1915) commissioned a portrait of his wife Sybil Frances Grey, Lady Eden (1867-1945). Whistler, dissatisfied with the amount (100gns) and manner of payment, retained and altered the portrait (Brown and Gold: Portrait of Lady Eden y408). After an appeal, in December 1897, the Court de Cassation let him retain the portrait but return the money. Whistler was well satisfied to see the Code Napoléon altered, to specify an artist's right to decide the fate of his works.
Whistler planned to publish an account of the affair, a compilation of letters, newspaper reports and legal documents, with William Heinemann (1863-1920), who had published the Gentle Art of Making Enemies in 1890. There was some problem with publishing in London, and, with Heinemann’s tacit agreement, Louis-Henry May (fl. 1878-1899) in Paris took over the publication. A first proof was run off, using mainly butterflies originally drawn for the Gentle Art of Making Enemies. These butterflies were mostly replaced by new ones, in a second proof. There are at least two versions of some of the designs. They were slightly reduced in size in the final publication.
For the book, Whistler designed 15 butterflies, a club (A club on a cushion m1564), and a frog (Frog m1553). He also drew some butterflies which were not used (v.: Butterfly; r.: see No. 1268 m1572, Butterfly with chequered wings m1578, r.: Butterfly; v.: Butterfly with chequered wings m1579). The Baronet and the Butterfly was comparatively sparing of butterflies. Many marginal annotations, which in the Gentle Art of Making Enemies would have warranted a butterfly, did not get one. Some of the butterflies were very badly reproduced (r. and v.: Butterfly m1561, r.: Butterfly 'Encountered'; v.: Butterfly m1562). There were obviously publication problems, and it was not an entirely satisfactory venture. However, Whistler did not admit of criticism and seems, publicly, to have been entirely satisfied with the outcome.

Title-page for ‘The Baronet and the Butterfly’, Harry Ransom Center, University of Texas, Austin, TX

Title-page for ‘Eden versus Whistler: The Baronet and the Butterfly’, Glasgow University Library
The butterfly was replaced by one with a barbed tail, Butterfly m1548, for publication in Whistler 1899 (F)[more].
Whistler used blue crayon, and black ink, the butterfly being in black ink.
The paper is uneven, especially on the left where it was torn from a folded sheet.
The early provenance is unknown.
It was not exhibited in Whistler's lifetime.