The Paintings of James McNeill Whistler

YMSM 122
Arrangement in Grey: Portrait of the Painter

Arrangement in Grey: Portrait of the Painter

Artist: James McNeill Whistler
Date: 1872
Collection: Detroit Institute of Arts
Accession Number: 34.27
Medium: oil
Support: canvas
Size: 74.9 x 53.3 cm (29 1/2 x 21")
Signature: butterfly
Inscription: none
Frame: Flat Whistler, painted basket-weave and butterfly, 1873

Date

Arrangement in Grey: Portrait of the Painter probably dates from 1872. 1 It is dated from the technique and signature, and from the fact that it was first exhibited in the Fifth Exhibition of the Society of French Artists [Winter Exhibition], Deschamps Gallery, London, 1872 (cat. no. 30).

Edward Guthrie Kennedy (1849-1932) understood that this self-portrait was painted by Whistler to see if he 'had kept his knack' in Valparaiso in 1866. 2 Initially this might seem possible, especially since on 5 February 1867 William Michael Rossetti (1829-1919) saw, at Whistler's house in Lindsey Row, a 'clever vivacious portrait of himself begun' (see Self-Portrait y078). 3 However, in later reminiscences Whistler never mentioned having painted a self-portrait in Valparaiso, and as the major work on this self-portrait almost certainly dates from shortly before its first exhibition in 1872, it is unlikely to have been this self-portrait, in its present form, which Rossetti saw in 1867.

Carjat & Cie., J. McN. Whistler, photograph,  1864/1865, GUL Whistler PH1/95
Carjat & Cie., J. McN. Whistler, photograph, 1864/1865, GUL Whistler PH1/95

Carjat & Cie., J. McN. Whistler,  photograph,  1864/1865, GUL Whistler PH1/96
Carjat & Cie., J. McN. Whistler, photograph, 1864/1865, GUL Whistler PH1/96

London Stereoscopic Co., J. McN. Whistler,  photograph, 1879, GUL Whistler PH1/97
London Stereoscopic Co., J. McN. Whistler, photograph, 1879, GUL Whistler PH1/97

Arrangement in Grey: Portrait of the Painter, Detroit Institute of Arts
Arrangement in Grey: Portrait of the Painter, Detroit Institute of Arts

Although photographs document Whistler's appearance during this period, none tally exactly with his appearance in the painting. This may be partly due to his hairdresser, but on the whole, a date mid-way between the photographs of 1864 and 1879 seems reasonable.

In 1895 Whistler indignantly refused to sign the portrait again for its new owner, George McCulloch (1848-1907), and explained that the butterfly was his recognised signature. 4

J. McNeill Whistler, etching by William Hole in The Art Journal, October 1897
J. McNeill Whistler, etching by William Hole in The Art Journal, October 1897

William Brassey Hole (1846-1917) etched the portrait for publication in the Art Journal in 1897. 5

Images

Arrangement in Grey: Portrait of the Painter, Detroit Institute of Arts
Arrangement in Grey: Portrait of the Painter, Detroit Institute of Arts

Arrangement in Grey: Portrait of the Painter, framed, 1980
Arrangement in Grey: Portrait of the Painter, framed, 1980

Arrangement in Grey: Portrait of the Painter, framed, 2015
Arrangement in Grey: Portrait of the Painter, framed, 2015

J. McNeill Whistler, etching by William Hole in The Art Journal, October 1897
J. McNeill Whistler, etching by William Hole in The Art Journal, October 1897

Portrait of Dr William McNeill Whistler, Art Institute of Chicago
Portrait of Dr William McNeill Whistler, Art Institute of Chicago

The Artist in his Studio (Whistler in his Studio), Art Institute of Chicago
The Artist in his Studio (Whistler in his Studio), Art Institute of Chicago

Carjat & Cie., J. McN. Whistler,  photograph,  1864/1865, GUL Whistler PH1/95
Carjat & Cie., J. McN. Whistler, photograph, 1864/1865, GUL Whistler PH1/95

Carjat & Cie., J. McN. Whistler,  photograph,  1864/1865, GUL Whistler PH1/96
Carjat & Cie., J. McN. Whistler, photograph, 1864/1865, GUL Whistler PH1/96

London Stereoscopic Co., J. McN. Whistler,  photograph, 1879, GUL Whistler PH1/97
London Stereoscopic Co., J. McN. Whistler, photograph, 1879, GUL Whistler PH1/97

Detail of Six paintings, GUL MS Whistler W784
Detail of Six paintings, GUL MS Whistler W784

Subject

Titles

Several possible titles have been suggested:

As the portrait of Thomas Carlyle (Arrangement in Grey and Black, No. 2: Portrait of Thomas Carlyle y137) has been called 'Arrangement in Grey and Black, No. 2' since Whistler's important one-man exhibition in 1874, a possible confusion has been avoided here by using the title 'Arrangement in Grey: Portrait of the Painter' for Whistler's self-portrait.

Description

Arrangement in Grey: Portrait of the Painter, Detroit Institute of Arts
Arrangement in Grey: Portrait of the Painter, Detroit Institute of Arts

A half-length self-portrait of the artist in vertical format. He stands in three-quarter view to left. He wears a pale grey jacket, a black cravat over a white shirt, and a black hat with a broad round brim. In his right hand, seen at lower left, he holds two square bristle brushes. The hand is awkwardly positioned, and the lower part of his torso is largely scraped down. Behind him is a grey wall and a black dado.

Sitter

London Stereoscopic Co., J. McN. Whistler, 1879, GUL Whistler PH1/97
London Stereoscopic Co., J. McN. Whistler, 1879, GUL Whistler PH1/97

James McNeill Whistler (1834-1903).

Whistler permitted Percy Thomas (1846-1922) to etch this self-portrait as a frontispiece for A Catalogue of the Etchings and Drypoints of James Abbott MacNeil Whistler in 1874, insisting only that he should check a proof. 13

Whistler's biographers, the Pennells, thought that this was the first self-portrait to show Whistler's lock of white hair. 14 MacDonald comments on Whistler's appearance, including the white lock, as presented in this and other portraits:

'He self-consciously refined his distinctive appearance. One conspicuous feature was a white lock – a genetic mutation called the Waardenburg syndrome – emphasized by the arrangement of his hair. A visitor to the Whistler household, Anne Benson Procter, described him acutely as 'a very remarkable looking person – dark – eyes and hair – and one white lock, on his forehead – all the family have this – He thinks very highly of his own works.' 15

Technique

Composition

The composition of Arrangement in Grey: Portrait of the Painter appears to reference that of Rembrandt’s Self-Portrait (1659, National Gallery of Art, Washington, DC), a very distinguished prototype. 16

Arrangement in Grey: Portrait of the Painter, Detroit Institute of Arts
Arrangement in Grey: Portrait of the Painter, Detroit Institute of Arts

Portrait of Dr William McNeill Whistler, Art Institute of Chicago
Portrait of Dr William McNeill Whistler, Art Institute of Chicago

Arrangement in Grey: Portrait of the Painter may be considered a pair with the portrait of his brother, Portrait of Dr William McNeill Whistler y123. It is the only oil self-portrait showing Whistler holding brushes (as well as sporting the conspicuous white lock).

The Artist in his Studio (Whistler in his Studio), Art Institute of Chicago
The Artist in his Studio (Whistler in his Studio), Art Institute of Chicago

An earlier study, The Artist in his Studio (Whistler in his Studio) y063, dating from 1865/1872, shows the artist with brushes and palette (but no white lock of hair). Whistler was right-handed, and the study is a mirror image, showing him painting with his left hand. The pose is awkward, as it is in the Arrangement in Grey: Portrait of the Painter. It is just possible that the two paintings are related, for Whistler had intended to enlarge Whistler in his Studio, and the self-portrait could have been a stage in that project, which was ultimately abandoned.

Technique

The 'grey' of the title forms the background of this portrait, yellowish-grey paint being applied carefully with vertical strokes except where the brush follows the outline of the head. The face is painted more fluidly, modelled with small brushes (5mm), the strokes following the lines and planes of the face. Way and Dennis commented in 1903 on 'the swinging energy of the line of the head.' 17

Touches of blue and red, green and brown, not completely mixed into the flesh tones, are seen in the shadows of the face. Some of the layers of colour and the highlights may have been mixed with varnish, to give a translucent glow to the face.

The painting of the jacket is in total contrast to the technique used on the face: it is roughly shaped and crudely scraped down. The arms remain unresolved. The hand was originally painted thickly, and originally it was placed lower than at present, but then scraped down and painted more thinly in cool pink shaded with grey and brown, with a soft, slightly scumbled effect.

Frame

Arrangement in Grey: Portrait of the Painter, framed
Arrangement in Grey: Portrait of the Painter, framed

Flat Whistler frame, with basket-weave pattern painted on three flat panels, one, at left, being signed with a butterfly. The decoration is painted, not, as was more usual, incised. The butterfly interrupts the pattern and is not placed on top of the basket weave motif. 18 The portrait was probably framed for exhibition at Durand-Ruel's in Paris in 1873, at which time Whistler explained to George Aloysius Lucas (1824-1909), 'my frames I have designed as carefully as my pictures - and thus they form as important a part as any of the rest of the work - carrying on the particular harmony throughout.' 19

History

Provenance

According to Whistler, he had originally sold the painting for £50. 20 In July 1895 it was sold through Goupil's to the Australian collector George McCulloch for £700. D.C. Thomson explained:

'He buys your picture really because we tell him that it is a fine work of art, but he does not understand it very well yet. He asks if you would be willing to sign it at the right hand bottom corner for him with your name. As you know it already bears your mark, and this we have pointed out to him.' 21

Whistler objected to this on several counts:

'Be good enough to say to Mr McCulloch with my compliments that the picture is signed - as completely as one of his own cheques is signed when he has written his name upon it. -

If, not content with that, he be ever asked to print it in the "bottom right hand corner", the nature of his own request to me, may become clear to him! -

I have, as you know, my own feelings about these purchases -

That Mr. Ionides should ask 700. for the work for which he gave me fifty pounds, is monstrous shamelessness - and you can tell him so from me. What right has he or any of these others to make one penny out of my brain & my battle! -

Also I am not at all pleased at Mr McCullochs having bought the portrait - as I don't want a single canvass of mine to remain in England.' 22

On the other hand, Whistler used this price as an excuse to raise his prices, explaining to Alexander Reid (1854-1928):

'You will have heard perhaps that the portrait of myself belonging to Mr. Ionides was sold the other day at Goupils (Mr Thomson) for £700 - He paid me £50 - for it - That is a look up for the two full lengths you still have - for my portrait, as you remember, was a half length ... 700 for the Furred Jacket is therefore no longer the price!' 23

Whistler told another art dealer, Edward Guthrie Kennedy (1849-1932), 'Yes, £700. is a large price for a head - even though it be my own.' 24 By 15 August it appears that Whistler had decided that McCulloch was Scottish (although he persisted in calling him 'McCullough'), and so he was satisfied, 'I am pleased to know that my portrait after all belongs to a Scotchman.' 25

In 1909 the price received by Mrs Coutts Michie was 100 guineas, but shortly afterwards, in July 1909 the painting was offered for sale to Charles Lang Freer (1856-1919) through Goupil for £3000. 26

Exhibitions

In early reviews of this self-portrait it was not the figure but the head that was criticised for its lack of finish. In 1872 The Times wrote: 'How imperfect Mr. Whistler is content to leave his work we may see in a portrait of himself called "Arrangement in gray and black" in the exhibition of French artists in Bond street. This is but the laying in of a head, excellent in modelling and relations of tone and colour, as far as it goes, but only the beginning and suggestion of something which the painter lacks either power or patience to carry out.' 27 Despite the lack of 'finish' it was exhibited frequently.

It was one of the first paintings to be given a musical title, and when Whistler sent his paintings to Durand-Ruel in 1873, he explained to G. A. Lucas, 'my frames … form as important a part as any of the rest of the work - carrying on the particular harmony throughout ... By the names of the pictures also I point out something of what I mean in my theory of painting.' 28

According to 'Megilp', a 'sensational' self-portrait by Whistler, 'extravagant to the last degree', which may have been this portrait, was hung in the Royal Glasgow Institute in Glasgow in 1880, but it was not mentioned in the catalogue or other reviews of the exhibition. 29 According to Lostalot, the self-portrait was shown at the Galerie Georges Petit in 1883 (cat. no. 2) as 'Arrangement gris'. 30

Detail of Six paintings, GUL MS Whistler W784
Detail of Six paintings, GUL MS Whistler W784

There is a rough pencil drawing by Whistler of this self-portrait in a list of Six paintings m1328 for a possible exhibition at the Royal Society of British Artists about 1886/1887. 31 The idea was abandoned when Whistler resigned as President of the society.

The oil was later described by Whistler as 'A fine portrait of me by myself, life sketch.' 32 The use of the word 'sketch' in a letter to a journalist could be considered as a precaution, avoiding potential criticisms of 'finish'. At first Whistler did not want this self-portrait included in his exhibition at the Goupil Gallery in 1892 but the owner issued an ultimatum, as D. C. Thomson reported to Whistler: 'Ionides poor man professes to be wishful not to be troubled again & says he will lend the portrait now or never!!' 33 Whistler therefore agreed to it being exhibited, but perhaps reluctantly, as in the catalogue it was given the title 'Grey and Black. Sketch', perhaps to avoid criticism of its unfinished appearance.

Bibliography

Catalogues Raisonnés

Authored by Whistler

Catalogues 1855-1905

Newspapers 1855-1905

Journals 1855-1905

Monographs

Books on Whistler

Books, General

Catalogues 1906-Present

Journals 1906-Present

Newspapers 1906-Present

Websites

Unpublished

Other


Notes:

1: YMSM 1980 [more] (cat. no. 122).

2: 'The Ionides portrait of himself was painted by him at Valparaiso to see if he had "kept his knack" as he told me himself': note by Kennedy, 20 July 1895, GUW #09732.

3: Rossetti 1903 [more], p. 222.

4: [11 July 1895], GUW #08305.

5: Art Journal October 1897 [more], pp. 289-90, etching by W. Hole repr. f.p. 289.

6: Fifth Exhibition of the Society of French Artists [Winter Exhibition], Deschamps Gallery, London, 1872 (cat. no. 30).

7: Exposition Internationale de Peinture, Galerie George Petit, Paris, 1883 (cat. no. 2).

8: Nocturnes, Marines & Chevalet Pieces, Goupil Gallery, London, 1892 (cat. no. 30).

9: A Connoisseur's Treasures [Alexander Ionides Collection], Goupil Gallery, London, 1895 (cat. no. 10).

10: Memorial Exhibition of the Works of the late James McNeill Whistler, First President of The International Society of Sculptors, Painters and Gravers, New Gallery, Regent Street, London, 1905 (cat. no. 30).

11: Exhibition of Modern Works in Painting and Sculpture forming the Collection of the late George M. McCulloch, Esq., Winter Exhibition 40th year, Royal Academy of Arts, London, 1909 (cat. no. 299).

12: YMSM 1980 [more] (cat. no. 122).

13: Whistler to R. Thomas, [5 May 1874], GUW #13681. Thomas 1874 [more].

14: Pennell 1908 [more], vol. 1, pp. 80, 137; Pennell 1911 A [more], p. 57. MacDonald 2015 [more], at pp. 207-08.

15: Whistler's half-sister Deborah had a similar white lock, see A. M. Whistler to K. Palmer, 21 May - 3 June [1872], GUW #09938; A. B. Procter to E. Forrest, 1 June 1877, GUW #12485; Whistler to T. Child, [October/November 1889], GUW #09264.

16: See MacDonald 2003 [more], p. 8. See also Stephenson, Andrew, ‘Refashioning Modern Masculinity: Whistler, Aestheticism and National Identity’, in Corbett: David Peters, and Lara Perry (eds.), English Art 1860-1914. Modern Artists and Identity, Manchester, 2000, pp. 133-49, at pp. 141-42.

17: Way & Dennis 1903 [more], p. 39.

18: Dr Sarah L. Parkerson Day, Report on frames, 2017; see also Parkerson 2007 [more].

19: [18 January 1873], GUW #09182.

20: Whistler to A. Ionides, [15 August 1895], GUW #02354.

21: D. C. Thomson to Whistler, 8 July 1895, GUW #05822.

22: [11 July 1895], GUW #08305; McCulloch accepted this decision, according to Thomson, 3 August 1895, GUW #05823; see also draft of letter to A. Ionides, [15 August 1895], GUW #02364.

23: Whistler to Reid, [2 July 1895], GUW #11724.

24: Whistler to E. G. Kennedy, 5 August [1895], GUW #09733.

25: Whistler to D. C. Thomson, 15 August [1895], GUW #08306.

26: Freer to R. Birnie Philip, 6 July 1909, GUW.

27: 'The Dudley Gallery', The Times, London, 11 November 1872, p. 4.

28: [18 January 1873], GUW #09182; see also an unidentified press cutting, February 1873, in GUL Whistler PC 1, pp. 61, 71A.

29: 'Megilp', Bailie, Glasgow, vol. 15, 21 January 1880, p. 11.

30: Lostalot 1883 [more], p. 80.

31: Whistler list, [1886/1887] formerly dated [4/11 January 1892], GUW #06795.

32: Whistler to T. Child, [October/November 1889], GUW #09264.

33: Whistler to D. C. Thomson, 11 March [1892], GUW #08358, reply 11 March 1892, GUW #05702.